# Classification in Indian Iconography [Part 5]

Posted: 18.05.2012
Updated on: 05.06.2012

§ 3. Classification in Kṛṣṇa Iconography

The simplest classification is always the safest classification. Divisions showing considerable depth produce more problems than Divisions with minimal depth (two to three planes), complex features (true divisions) are less precise than features concerning details (pseudo-divisions). More often than not, true divisions are inaccurate because there is no concomitance (see p. 29 above). Below we supply two pairs of pseudo-divisions (a/b and x/y): -

 (a) Kṛṣṇa with two arms (b) Kṛṣṇa with more than two arms (x) Kṛṣṇa not Viṣṇuized (y) Kṛṣṇa Viṣṇuized

It would be tempting to weld the four pseudo-divisions into two true divisions (a-plus-x, b-plus-y). But there is no clear concomitance a/x and b/y. The Viṣṇuization of Kṛṣṇa figures with more than two arms is in most cases not very pronounced, while it is not completely absent from two-armed figures. The tendency to replace true divisions by pseudo-divisions wherever necessary can be described as splitting. The same term can also be used to describe the dividing of more complex true divisions into less complex true divisions (e.g. "Varāha" into theriomorphic and therio-anthropomorphic Varāha). However, "splitting" is not just another word for "classification". It always negates a well-established concept or a seemingly plausible hypothesis. For an earlier discussion of the problem refer to Deogarh § 313.

Below, a classification of the various Kṛṣṇa-images (up to 900 A.D.) is attempted. As indicated already, true divisions could not be established. The variables refer either to entire panels (1-12) or to the Kṛṣṇa figure as such (13-16).

Kṛṣṇa does not appear in “pantheon images“, showing different deities side by side. The ten-avatāra motif has either Balarāma or "Vāsudeva" (Balarāma's pendant in iconoplastic art, looking like Viṣṇu pure and simple) or Veṇugopāla (Variable 11). The ten-avatāra motif does not seem to occur before the mediaeval period. Inscribed Kṛṣṇa-images belonging to the periods before 900 A.D. have not come to light.

§ 4. Acknowledgements and Bibliography on Kṛṣṇa

The author is under a very heavy obligation to Dr. Nagaraja Rao (Director of Archaeology, Karnatak State) who undertook an arduous trip to Badami and Pattadakal in order to secure photographs required for the preparation of this article. The author would also like to thank Dr. Gritli von Mitterwallner (Munich) who placed the Kṛṣṇa photographs from her collection at his disposal and gave her advice on general problems as well as on points of detail. A few photographs (none of them published here) were supplied by other colleagues.

General surveys of the available Kṛṣṇa panels have been undertaken by H. Goetz, U. P. Shah, and K. S. Desai:

• H. Goetz, The Earliest Representations of the Myth Cycle of Kṛṣṇa Govinda (JOI I, I Sept. 1951, pp. 51-59);
• U. P. Shah, Śrikṛṣṇanīalīlā (Svādhyāya 10, 4, August 1973, pp. 483-505);
• K. S. Desai, Iconography of Viṣṇu, 1973, pp. 123 foll.;

More specialized are the following enquiries:

• P. V. van Stein Callenfels. De Kṛṣṇāyana aan Panataran (Tijdschrift voor Indische Taal-, Land- en Volkenkunde, 64. 1924, pp. 196-206);
• J. Przyluski, Revue des Arts Asiatiques, Annales du Musée Guimet, 5. 1928, pp. 91-97 [Angkor-Vat];
• R. C. Agrawala, Ind. Hist. Quarterly, 30, 4 (Dec. 1954), pp. 339 foll. [Rajasthan];
• Lalit Kalā 7. 1960, pp. 82 foll. [Khajuraho];
• Pratapaditya Pal, Vaiṣṇava Iconology in Nepal, Calcutta (1970), pp. 87 foll.

For the literary sources (Mahābhārata and Purāṇas) refer to:

• S. N. Tadapatrikar, The Kṛṣṇa Problem (Annals BORI, 10.3-4, 1930, pp. 269-344) and
• W. Ruben, [in German], Istanbul 1944.

The publications by this author mentioned on p. 26 above are the following:

• The Figures of the Two Lower Reliefs on the Pārśvanātha Temple at Khajuraho, Ācārya Vijayavallabhasūri Comm. Vol., Bombay 1956, pp. 7-35;
• Distinction in Indian Iconography, Bull. Deccan Coll. Res. Inst. 20. 1960, pp. 164-248;
• The Jina-Images of Deogarh, Leiden 1969;
• Wiederholung in der indischen Ikonographie (in German,=Repetition in Indian Iconography), Indologentagung 1971, Wiesbaden 1973, pp. 99-125;
• Further Observations on the Iconography of Pārśvanātha. Mahavira and His Teachings, Bombay 1976.