research design phd thesis pay essay school how to type up a business plan research paper conclusion paragraph eng essay writing customwriting dissertation structure uk james kruger writer school paper

sex movies

سكس عربي

arabic sex movies



سكس xxx

Economics Of Mahavira: [09.16] Livelihood with Religion. Limits to Desires - Needs and Satisfaction

Published: 18.05.2006
Updated: 06.08.2008

The conclusion that emerges on a deeper examination from the point of view of anekanta is that the truth lies between the two positions. The belief of economic theory that, with too much reduction in wants, social progress cannot be achieved is not without foundation.

Similarly, the view that, with much multiplication of wants unhappiness or even misery increases is also valid. To the latter point of view, religion provides the support. The support to the economic point of view is available as, according to Marshall, Economics is a science of human welfare and its main aim is to increase human welfare. Economics attempts to show the way to satisfy unlimited wants with the limited resources. However, the proportion in which the wants can be increased is not correlated with the corresponding proportion in which the needs can be satisfied. Most of the people are able to satisfy their high priority needs. Comparatively a few people are able to satisfy their needs for comforts. Only a very few are able to satisfy their needs for luxuries, which occupy a low priority.

  • Economics Of Mahavira by © Acharya Mahaprajna
  • Edited by Muni Dhananjay Kumar
  • Translated by Dr. S.R. Mohnot
  • Published by Jain Vishwa Bharti, University, Ladnun, India, 1st Edition 2000, 2nd Edition 2001

Share this page on:
Page glossary
Some texts contain  footnotes  and  glossary  entries. To distinguish between them, the links have different colors.
  1. Anekanta
  2. Science
Page statistics
This page has been viewed 1251 times.
© 1997-2022 HereNow4U, Version 4.5
Contact us
Social Networking

HN4U Deutsche Version
Today's Counter: